Is there a way to just get the raw data? All of the collected sensor information will be interpreted through a processing sketch, so I should be able to calculate the values from there without all of the ‘>>’ weirdness in the barometer library.
I think some values are probably off-set in a way that returns these odd values. Let me try it on mine tomorrow and see where it goes. If I see something wrong with it, I’ll try to have a fix for it and a PR.
We have fixed the problem with the library. It seems like there was just a small problem with it when running it with Python 3 instead of 2. In Python 3, explicit type casting is required as opposed to the 2.
This is the PR we have done:
And if you want to update it to the latest, just use: